A new study sought to assess protein
requirements at the whole-body level using the IAAO technique in trained subjects.
Background
The RDA for protein is
established at 0.8g/kg as the minimum
protein intake to offset protein deficiency (net nitrogen losses) for 97.5% of the healthy population above 19 years (1). Believe it or not, the RDA
was even deemed appropriate for healthy adults undertaking resistance
or endurance exercise (2).
The RDA represents the
estimated average requirement plus 2 standard deviations (3), determined from
selected nitrogen-balance studies of
which very few were performed in older individuals (4,5).
Nitrogen balance studies suffer from several
methodologic concerns (6-10). In addition to the impractical need for repeated 7- to 10-d
adaptation periods necessary to produce accurate NB data for each of the
several protein intakes needed to determine the requirement (6), the use of a linear regression line with a greater
residual error for analyzing nonlinear
data is not a good fit for either NB or oxidation data (6,8,11).
There is
also an over- or underestimation of nitrogen intake and excretion, respectively
(6,12). Furthermore, NB may be achievable at low protein intakes for the brief
study durations often used because of more efficient amino acid (AA)
utilization, reduced turnover rates, and/or accommodation (6,13,14,15).
Better methods such as
the indicator amino acid oxidation
(IAAO) technique show that the RDA underestimated protein needs by 30-50% (16,17,18).
The IAAO technique identifies the plateau in AA oxidation that corresponds to
the maximum rate of whole-body protein synthesis.
When dietary protein is
inadequate the oxidation of all AAs, including the indicator AA, will be
substantial (6). With increasing dietary protein oxidation of the indicator AA
will decrease because more AAs are being incorporated into body protein, and once
the dietary requirement is met there is no further change in the oxidation of
the indicator AA and the resulting ‘‘breakpoint’’ is thought to be the
requirement (6,10).
Isotope tracer
methodology is considered to be a far more accurate technique, and the IAAO technique
was considered an acceptable method to assess protein requirements back in 2005
(6,19).
A protein intake of 0.93-1.2 g/kg/day, exceeding the
current requirement by as much as 50%, was unveiled in men using the using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique (18). The results
were comparable with those estimated by the application of a biphase linear regression model to the
data from nitrogen balance studies (0.91 and 1.0 g/kg/d) (18).
Nevertheless, the few available NB studies on bodybuilders are quite variable, and even
very positive NB (3.8–20 g/d) with protein intakes of 1.8–2.7 g/kg/d observed
in men engaged in a rigorous strength-training (ST) program do not result in the
expected fat-free mass (FFM) accrual (3,6,19,20). For example, a positive NB (12–20
g N/d) at a protein intake of 2.8g/kg should produce 300–500 g lean mass gain/d, however this was not observed
(20).
Stable isotope identified
4 different states of protein metabolism studies (6,14,15,21,22):
1) ‘‘protein
deficiency,’’ defined as the maximal reduction in protein synthesis to all but
the essential organs;
2) ‘‘accommodation,’’ in
which balance is achieved via a decrease in physiologic relevant processes;
3) ‘‘adaptation,’’ in which optimal growth,
interorgan AA exchange, and immune function are present; and
4) ‘‘excess,’’ which is characterized by AA oxidization
for energy and nitrogen excretion via urea, resulting in no further stimulation
of protein synthesis (15).
Regardless of age, when
protein intakes near the current RDA are combined with Strength training,
accommodation results through increased nitrogen utilization efficiency and lower whole-body protein synthesis rates
rather than adaptation (6,19,21,23).
Current dietary protein
recommendation for bodybuilders varies widely, from the RDA of 0.85g/kg/d (16) to
as much as 2.0 g/kg/d (24).
During exercise there is an increase in
aminoacid oxidation (1-5% of the total energetic cost of exercise), increased
catabolism and increased muscle protein synthesis (25,26,27). Under-recovery is
also another concern (25,28).
Protein requirements for bodybuilders in
nontraining days
A new study sought to assess protein
requirements at the whole-body level using the IAAO technique, in 8 individuals
who had undergone regular bodybuilding training for more than 3 years (6). Subjects had a mean 84kg of body mass, 72.4 kg
of LBM, and a fat free mass index of 24.
